Haven’t posted in a while, so here’s a bit about the independent project that my friend and I just finished.
We wanted to do something with predator-prey interactions, specifically, how one species reacts differently to predators and preys. We used the green lynx spider, which is really common on Ruellia inundata plants here in Palo Verde. These spiders are really well camouflaged, so finding them (we sampled 250 individuals!) was half the battle.
For each spider tested, there were three stimuli: A predator (black wasp), a pollinator/prey (honeybee) and a control (brown clay). The objects were attached to skewers and presented to the spiders in random order, with at least 15 minutes between stimuli for each spider. We looked at males, females, and juveniles.
(lots of statistics)
As concisely as possible, here are our findings:
-Females tended to be found more on flowers than on the vegetation. This is likely because for females with parental care responsibilities, one of the two ways to increase fitness (aka number of offspring: amount of genetic material passed on) is to increase the number of eggs produced. Females that are larger can produce more eggs, so it would benefit the female spiders to stay near the flowers, where pollinators can be caught.
-Males, on the other hand, were found more frequently in the vegetation that within attack distance of flowers. Several males were observed moving through the vegetation from plant to plant during the study, possibly in search of mates or territory. Males can increase their fitness by increasing how much they mate, so their priorities could be locating mates rather than feeding.
-Reaction distance (distance between the spider and the stimulus at the moment the spider reacts) was small for all stimuli for males, females, and juveniles. This can be explained by the spiders’ reliance on crypsis (camouflage) as an antipredator strategy. Cryptic animals can actually increase vulnerability if they move; they may spur an attack that might not have otherwise occurred.
-Additionally, reaction distance was highest for predators. This makes sense. Risk of predation is a very high cost relative to the benefit of catching prey, and when there is a threat, avoiding predation will dominate an animal’s decision.
-In general, spiders hid from the predator, attacked the pollinator/prey, and did not react to the control. It may also be relevant that females did not react to the predator more frequently than they hid, and they sometimes attacked. This could be due to size; female green lynx spiders are larger than males and, in some cases, were larger than the predator stimulus. Juveniles, on the other hand, hid more frequently than adult males or females for all stimuli. They also hid from the bee more often than they attacked it, again likely due to size.
—> This result, as well as the higher reaction distance to predator than to prey, indicates that animals can visually differentiate between a threat and a meal. As one would expect, individuals with vision keen enough to do so would be highly favored by natural selection, because the consequences of misidentification are extreme.
So that’s it in a nutshell! We presented on the project and handed in the first draft of our scientific papers today. Tomorrow we’re off to Tivies mangrove field and the beach for two days, then back to Palo Verde to get ready for mid terms.
It’s still hot here-I don’t think the temperature has dropped below 90 F in the daytime-but we’re much more used to it now. And it’s sunny every day, which is fantastic!
Adios!